Re: About FDEP(GSoC proposal)

2012-03-31T13:27:22+01:00

Interesting, however we can't compare SDEB or FDEB because they emphasis totally different things in networks (see Fig 7). The research papers does not detail how to interpret the visual output - which largely reduces the interest of the contribution. But they seems at least to be clear on this point:

There is no fundamental reason why a skeleton-based layout should be preferable to other bundling heuristics, apart from the intuition that a skeleton represents the local center of a shape. Hence, the quality of our layouts (or any other bundled layout) is still to be judged subjectively.

Hence I consider this technique a something totally new, and how to use it should be studied before considering an implementation in Gephi.

Statistics:Posted by admin — 31 Mar 2012 13:27

About FDEP(GSoC proposal)

2012-03-30T21:34:46+01:00

How about if the Force Directed Edge Bundling technique is replaced by the Skeleton-based Edge Bundling technique (http://www.cs.rug.nl/svcg/Shapes/SBEB) published last year, I think it's faster and produces less clutter than the FDEB technique.
--
Eduardo Gonzalo Espinoza Carreon

Statistics:Posted by edubecks — 30 Mar 2012 21:34

Gephi forums

Re: About FDEP(GSoC proposal)

About FDEP(GSoC proposal)