[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/session.php on line 583: sizeof(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/session.php on line 639: sizeof(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4516: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3262)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4516: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3262)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4516: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3262)
Gephi forums •[TODO] Data laboratory: reversing the directions of edges?
Page 1 of 1

[TODO] Data laboratory: reversing the directions of edges?

Posted: 08 Sep 2010 11:01
by seinecle
Hi,

I found it a frequent need to be able to quickly change the direction of my edges (that is, inverting the direction of all edges: if I have a graph made of a->b and b->c, it would become b->a and c->b. It basically consists in transposing the matrix of nodes.

Will it be possible to achieve this easily with the new data laboratory?

[this feature is useful when computing betweenness and many other things, as it does not give the same result for a transposed matrix. See UCINET]

Re: Data laboratory: reversing the directions of edges?

Posted: 08 Sep 2010 13:39
by eduramiba
Hi, this is a good idea that could be useful as a data laboratory action.
I will think how to implement it, some edges could not be possible to be reversed in some cases.

Eduardo

Re: [TODO] Data laboratory: reversing the directions of edge

Posted: 24 Dec 2013 11:53
by miro.marchi

Re: [TODO] Data laboratory: reversing the directions of edge

Posted: 08 Jan 2014 20:56
by eduramiba
Sorry, this is not implemented (it's still considered for implementation) since it wasn't critical or very needed.

Eduardo