Search found 41 matches
- 17 Dec 2010 19:03
- Forum: QA: Ideas, Requests and Feedback
- Topic: procedural attributes
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3528
Re: procedural attributes
Hi Sebastien, This system may be a generic way to allow the concept of real-time attributes updates inside Gephi. It may indeed collides with the very notion of what an attribute is, notion which has never been discussed publicly - Why not discuss about it now? I gave the dynamic layout as an exampl...
- 17 Dec 2010 17:18
- Forum: QA: Ideas, Requests and Feedback
- Topic: procedural attributes
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3528
procedural attributes
Hi, this is an idea I got today. I was trying to implement a dynamic layout algorithm, and got stuck at the design phase: which layout algorithm should I extend? ForceAtlas? OpenOrd? They all could benefit from dynamic weight, but it would be a bit awkward to create 10 additional versions of these l...
- 02 Dec 2010 16:49
- Forum: Specifications
- Topic: Gephi on the web
- Replies: 15
- Views: 55843
Re: Gephi on the web
Some others libraries for WebGL stuff: EnergizeGL http://energize.cc/ X3DOM http://www.x3dom.org/ Comment: Only to read static files / scenes? more a viewer lib than a framework to builds apps? GWTGL - Google Web Toolkit + WebGL http://code.google.com/p/gwtgl/ Description: "GwtGL enables you to deve...
- 17 Nov 2010 16:56
- Forum: Legals
- Topic: [IMPORTANT] Gephi license: leaving GNU AGPL to BSD?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 184113
Re: [IMPORTANT] Gephi license: leaving GNU AGPL to BSD?
I agree with you on bugfixes. This seems indeed counter-productive to every developer to keep these enhancements out of the main software branch. Contamination of new features by GPL is indeed part of the "long term changes" plan. When one think about it, this is a beautiful idea, perhaps too in adv...
- 15 Nov 2010 20:10
- Forum: Legals
- Topic: [IMPORTANT] Gephi license: leaving GNU AGPL to BSD?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 184113
Re: [IMPORTANT] Gephi license: leaving GNU AGPL to BSD?
Right - I understand the merits of the true goal of this "GPL bashing" debate : having companies using Gephi, in the hope this will trigger more job opportunities. You may indeed have more users with BSD. People will have their well-paid jobs, working on proprietary versions of tools based on the Ge...
- 15 Nov 2010 00:10
- Forum: Legals
- Topic: [IMPORTANT] Gephi license: leaving GNU AGPL to BSD?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 184113
Re: [IMPORTANT] Gephi license: leaving GNU AGPL to BSD?
I believe we indeed need more pragmatism on how Gephi interacts with its community. To be honest, I'm not really convinced there are so many end users who want to compile code themselves instead of buying. See the success of App Store: it works, people buy. Stuff. They don't care about "how it is ma...
- 03 Nov 2010 12:33
- Forum: Alpha/Beta
- Topic: Ubuntu Package for Gephi
- Replies: 4
- Views: 25633
Re: Ubuntu Package for Gephi
It looks like we could get Gephi added to debian/ubuntu distros! The process for ubuntu is explained here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages It appears we could simply submit Gephi to Debian, because if a package is already on debian, it can be added to ubuntu repositories The pr...
- 06 Oct 2010 16:38
- Forum: Alpha/Beta
- Topic: Ubuntu Package for Gephi
- Replies: 4
- Views: 25633
Re: Ubuntu Package for Gephi
it works! thanks!
- 04 Oct 2010 18:58
- Forum: Dynamics
- Topic: Zoomable timeline / direct entry of filter start/end times
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3981
Re: Zoomable timeline / direct entry of filter start/end tim
Hi, thanks you Snurb ! I propose to talk about future timeline improvements in a dedicated thread, which I created there : http://forum.gephi.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=566&p=1688#p1688 by grouping them this it will be easier to keep tracks of the progress, since these features are related together (th...
- 04 Oct 2010 18:55
- Forum: Dynamics
- Topic: [FIXED] Timeline Player
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3378
Re: Timeline Player
Hi, I propose to talk about future timeline improvements in a dedicated thread, which I created there : http://forum.gephi.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=566&p=1688#p1688 by grouping them this it will be easier to keep tracks of the progress, since these features are related together (they all have impact ...