Statistics:Posted by admin — 08 Dec 2010 21:38
CODE:
<attributes class="node" type="dynamic"> <attribute id="0" title="Attribute 1" type="float"/></attributes>
CODE:
<node id="0" label="USA"><attvalues><attvalue for="0" value="9" start="2006" endopen="2007" /><attvalue for="0" value="21" start="2007" endopen="2008" /><attvalue for="0" value="17" start="2008" endopen="2009" /><attvalue for="0" value="19" start="2009" endopen="2010" /></attvalues><slices><slice start="2006" endopen="2010" /></slices>
Statistics:Posted by Luciano — 08 Dec 2010 18:58
Statistics:Posted by admin — 28 Nov 2010 18:12
Statistics:Posted by jbilcke — 26 Sep 2010 21:10
Is not a good reason. What is the benefit of using doubles instead of floats?I propose to replace float by double because double is how it is in Gephi.
Statistics:Posted by admin — 26 Sep 2010 20:35
CODE:
2001 => 2.12002 => 5.22003 => 6.5
CODE:
[2001, 2002) => 2.1[2002, 2003) => 5.2[2003, +inf] => 6.5
CODE:
<attributes class="node" type="dynamic"> <attribute id="0" title="type" type="string"/> <attribute id="1" title="Attribute 1" type="float"/></attributes>
Statistics:Posted by mbastian — 26 Sep 2010 18:02