I am not "expert" in multipartite networks, but I am a bit interested in this type of networks. That's true, there is a problem with papers/literature about multipartite networks in general. From my point of view, the good starting point are bipartite/affiliation networks.mbastian wrote:Thanks for your suggestion. Multipartite networks are something very important indeed, and an area we haven't really explored yet. My knowledge is limited about them and would like to learn more in order to think about the necessary tooling. First of all, is the study of multipartite networks discu
I don't know about implementations of all of these features. Many tools focus only on bipartite networks http://networkx.lanl.gov/reference/algo ... rtite.html.mbastian wrote:In terms of features you list important points. Do you links to papers or code implementing those for multipartite networks?
I know, but I am not sure, if it is good idea to have for each node(edge) type new attribute for each future...mbastian wrote:In terms of implementation it's not something that should be too difficult to do. One can add attributs to nodes and edges easily in Gephi.
Statistics:Posted by jaroslav.kuchar — 28 Mar 2012 11:01
Statistics:Posted by mbastian — 25 Mar 2012 19:37
Statistics:Posted by jaroslav.kuchar — 25 Mar 2012 18:47